Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
m0cking bird wrote: You're p dumb. What are you on about? Do you even know? Guess someone who's ******** wouldn't. You're so deluded it's unbelievable. The first question I would ask someone if I'm not aware of what they're referencing. Would b...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.22 02:13:00
|
2. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zarnak Wulf wrote: John Nucleus wrote: I believe the pros and cons of Laser are balanced with other weapon system. Therefore, having to waste a bonus in order to use them is not justified. Apparently, this bonus was introduced when Laser wer...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.21 06:08:00
|
3. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tsubutai wrote: Takeshi Yamato wrote: By the way I agree that the current slot layout of the Retribution is still as if the intent was to make the ship sub-par on purpose. It needs a web so badly. The Punisher doesn't have a tracking bon...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.21 04:41:00
|
4. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Funny thing! Those who agreed with the proposed changes. Have now come to the conclusion these changes are a bad idea. The chat has been around what ships will still be viable after these changes. Answer below... These are the ships that may surv...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.20 18:51:00
|
5. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: m0cking bird wrote: Start removing slots CCP! Stop taking drugs Proxyyy! Made me lol, because I'm smoking a drug right now. Remove extra slots from the Ishkur, Wolf, Harpy, Vengeance (dont remember if this s...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.20 00:54:00
|
6. Tornado or Oracle? And why? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Oracle Heat Sink II Heat Sink II Heat Sink II Pseudoelectron Containment Field I Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Warp Disruptor II Mega Pulse Laser II, Mu...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.20 00:50:00
|
7. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Start removing slots CCP!
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.20 00:23:00
|
8. Tornado or Oracle? And why? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: Aamrr wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: I looked at this last night and I feel that the Tornado wins because its: - Faster - Better tracking - Num mids >= 4 -Liang I thought tracking didn't matter on tier-3's? You g...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.20 00:20:00
|
9. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zarnak Wulf wrote: FFS - you guys realize that with the extra mids many of these AF can now use dual propulsion, right?!? You get the best of both worlds. Get on top of the target using the MWD. Then go to AB. When I started the game the firs...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.19 05:01:00
|
10. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Uppsy Daisy wrote: For the love of god proxyyy, learn how to write in sentences! No! It's to hard and i don't want to put much effort into it. Also, its not very boss if i did care...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.19 00:11:00
|
11. Drake changes from CSM minutes. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Even without resistance bonuses. Drakes have alot of defence. More damage might be a bad idea.
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.18 20:44:00
|
12. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Strange thing is. Assault frigates have been gaining popularity in 0.0 and Interceptors have been declining in use. This is mainly because of pirate and navy faction frigates. Those pilots that understand frigate combat and meta. Know, that most f...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.18 17:43:00
|
13. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: Bent Barrel wrote: What is your envisioned ROLE for the AF ? Not what you want to use it for but the general role. The MWD bonus enables only one: tackler. That role is already taken. A good tackler needs speed, agil...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.17 10:18:00
|
14. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zarnak Wulf wrote: I support the changes. Some tweaking - such as the jag's fitting - is needed. But as a whole the class feels more balanced with itself and much mote capable of big game hunting. Frigates as a whole need to be raised. EAF. I...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.17 09:58:00
|
15. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Delusional (tell those voices in your head to STFU). I only use one character for the forums and another by mistake. Alot of pilots who use assault frigate. Which is primary in low security space. Are expressing their dislike of these changes. A...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.17 00:24:00
|
16. Succubus, Phantasm, and the Nightmare just me or do they seem a little under the... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
No! It's just you...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.16 20:54:00
|
17. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Morgan North wrote: /me wonders on how HAC's would do with afterburner speed bonuses. I'm a big fan of after burning cruisers now. They're pretty powerful. Thing is though. They have a hard time tracking other after-burning cruisers lol. Th...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.16 19:55:00
|
18. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Very glad other pilots have returned to this discussion and are making their opinions known. +1 I also believe assault frigates do not need a role bonus. How that idea became popular is a p funny story. Has alot to do with Interceptors role bonus...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.16 18:33:00
|
19. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You're p dumb. What are you on about? Do you even know? Guess someone who's ******** wouldn't. You're so deluded it's unbelievable. The first question I would ask someone if I'm not aware of what they're referencing. Would be. What set-ups are you...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.16 02:20:00
|
20. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ninevite wrote: As my question went unanswered, I am asking it again: So the point of the role bonus is to make AFs more usable in big fleets, though if I was going to take a t2 frigate for the purpose of tackling in a fleet I would just take ...
- by m0cking bird - at 2012.01.15 22:07:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |